When I started this blog, I knew I wanted to show and share my respect, my amazement and awe about the natural world with my readers. I always felt those scarlet poppies growing around my sandbox, those hydrangeas forming a natural gate between my house and my grandmother's and her cherished apple, pear, and nut trees hold a special place in my childhood memories.
I also remember the move when I was ten to a track house with two by four boards bridging the driveway to the doorway to avoid the mud; and not a tree on the property. The change was devastating.
Oddly, reading Richard Louv's book, Last Child In The Woods, all these years later, explains the loss I felt, but never identified. That loss is nature-deficit-disorder.
Today, as the grandmother who has the glorious opportunity to share my wooded forest with my granddaughter, I understand and value this gift.
The strength of Richard Louv's book is the overflowing, readable research which, at first thought, is profoundly self-evident, but overlooked or ignored for generations. These obvious facts startle the reader; first, because we know allowing the natural world to decay with such a blatent neglect is simply wrong; second, acting on his information, recognized by the 2008 Audubon Award, will connect future generations to nature. It truly is a very simple cause/effect relationship that no one can reject and everyone should embrace.
Just as important as the references, statistics and philosophy are Louv's personal anedotes and those he offers from others. One friend told him that if you cannot name a tree, plant, or animal you will not appreciate its value. I found the same analogy true after many years of teaching. Learning a child's name was the first, sometimes only, step needed to improve his behavior.
Taking the person out of personal is similar to taking the nature out of natural. We must strive to move our technology forward without losing sight of the individuality of nature.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Just started reading this book. I think part of what's missing is the appreciation of the outdoors without the guilt. I remember watching Jaques Coustoe (sp?) when I was a kid. Marty Stoufer (sp) also. They were both more about appreciation of nature without a sales pitch to save it or a diatribe about how it's being lost forever. I kinda think that if you just give kids a taste of it, the reason to save it is self evident. Look at this beautiful natural world, it's all being lost, it's all being paved, etc... they just feel hopeless. Anyway just a thought. Like I said, I just started this book. I think I'll like it. I can't hardly watch nature programming on TV anymore. It comes across as too depressing.
Post a Comment